<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rssdatehelper="urn:rssdatehelper"><channel><title>InCredit</title><link>http://www.graydoninternational.com</link><pubDate>2012-05-17T12:13:07</pubDate><generator>umbraco</generator><description></description><language>en</language><item><title>Clinton Cards can no longer push the envelope</title><link>http://www.graydoninternational.com/blog/2012/5/17/clinton-cards-can-no-longer-push-the-envelope.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.graydoninternational.com/blog/2012/5/17/clinton-cards-can-no-longer-push-the-envelope.aspx</guid><description><![CDATA[ 
<p>In 2009 Clinton Cards made a pre-tax profit of £24.1m on sales
of £345m, an operating profit margin of 7%. Last year it made a
loss of £10.6m on sales of £364m. Last week saw this one time High
Street giant slip into administration to become another statistic
of austerity.</p>

<p>In its pomp Clinton owned more than 1,100 shops and had 25% of
the greeting card market. With associated buying-power they pushed
the envelope and paid manufacturers as little as 30p for a card
they sold for £3. With 8,000 staff and rents said to exceed £80M it
was a model that relied on sales, sales and more sales. Where did
it all go wrong?</p>

<p>Following the banking crisis, high street footfall mirrored
reductions in consumer confidence that was further stifled by
government austerity measures. Forced to shop around, consumers
found supermarkets and the internet offering lower priced cards,
with the latter offering personalisation. Cash flow problems now
hit Clinton, restructuring resulted and branches closed.</p>

<p>Ironically, it was to the banks that Clinton went for help to
ease their cash flow problems with Barclays and RBS providing them
with a total of £35M. The banks ultimately gave temporary waivers
for 'technical breaches' before deciding to sell the loans to
American Greetings (Clinton Cards biggest supplier) who, you've
guessed, called in the loan!</p>

<p>If circumstances conspired against Clinton, it's clear that they
responded too slowly to changing market conditions. Herein lies a
lesson for all businesses big or small, B2B or B2C. The inability
to meet the demands of creditors can seriously damage the health of
a business. Witness our own recent research undertaken in
partnership with the Forum of Private Business among SMEs on the
topic of payment trends.</p>

<p>According to our survey 59% said they pay late, either
intentionally or unintentionally, with 77% of these citing late
payments by their own customers as a reason. Other factors leading
to late payments include: insufficient funds 70%, and a lack of
affordable finance from banks 55%. So what can you do to protect
your cash flow?</p>

<p>Saying "no" to business is always an option. There is little
point taking credit information only to ignore its advice. There is
even less point getting paid late yet continuing to supply. When
all the signals tell you that your buyer is having problems, heed
the signals, be brave and say "no."&nbsp; However, once you have a
customer, there is much you can do to get them to pay.</p>

<p>Step up your collection activity; use your directors and your
sales people to contact your buyer, use e-invoicing, and make
pre-due calls and get a commitment to pay. Remember that companies
owe money but people pay bills. Polite persistence pays.</p>

<p>(ct)</p>
]]></description></item><item><title>Chasing late payers and taking control of your credit process: not the moment for a stiff upper lip</title><link>http://www.graydoninternational.com/blog/2012/4/23/chasing-late-payers-and-taking-control-of-your-credit-process-not-the-moment-for-a-stiff-upper-lip.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.graydoninternational.com/blog/2012/4/23/chasing-late-payers-and-taking-control-of-your-credit-process-not-the-moment-for-a-stiff-upper-lip.aspx</guid><description><![CDATA[ 
<p>A Treasury Committee report published last week confirmed
'serious and often insurmountable problems' in securing bank
lending at reasonable rates. At least that was the view of some
MPs, including Labour's rising star Chuka Umuna, who took the study
as their cue to attack Government policies on loan guarantees, and
other commentators, including the <span>Daily Mail</span> who
quickly spotted the chance to indulge in a little banker bashing
(as is the wont of middle Britain in these troubled times).</p>

<p>But take a moment to look beyond the politically charged access
to finance maelstrom and you quickly realise that the issue of
tighter bank lending policies is just one part of the business
credit equation. After all, surely nobody wants a feast of
reckless, speculative lending followed by an inglorious spate of
failures.</p>

<p>From a credit perspective, this puts the onus on businesses
themselves to proactively manage their credit profiles, and ensure
that the rating agency community is able to present them in the
best possible (and accurate) light, so they and their business
partners can trade with confidence on the basis of optimised credit
decisioning information.</p>

<p>That's the principle anyway. But getting your accounts in order
counts for nothing if your cashflow situation looks as desperate as
Chelsea's rearguard action against Barcelona in last week's
football encounter.</p>

<p>And it's here that the issue of having robust credit control
procedures in place comes to the fore. A new report published this
week by Graydon UK and the Forum of Private Businesses suggests
many firms could do better in this respect.</p>

<p>The poll of 500 companies revealed that only 44 per cent had
formal credit control procedures in place, 38 per cent mixing
formal and informal approaches, and the remainder seemingly making
it up as they went along.</p>

<p>It's a case of 'not so happy go lucky' though as the survey
highlighted also how the late payment of trade invoices is still
impacting 51 per cent of companies. And of those affected, one in
five say they've nearly been put out of business as a result.</p>

<p>So as the late payment culture persists, companies need to stay
on the backs of those customers who withhold cash. Traditional
British reticence to ask for payment is not what the Doctor should
be ordering here. Our study found that when companies do take
proactive steps to chase late payers, such as telephone contact,
stringent credit checking or simply refusing to complete future
projects, the late payers are often kicked into action.</p>

<p>In the meantime, Graydon is one of the organisations, along with
the afore-mentioned FPB, the Institute of Credit Managers, and
indeed Lloyds TSB which is vocally seeking Government action to
stamp out late payment.</p>

<p>But with the best will in the world, success on that front isn't
going to be achieved overnight, and in the interim everyone seeking
to grow their bottom line needs to take their own credit
decisioning seriously. It could save your (business) life.</p>

<p>For a full copy of the Graydon UK report on late payment,
produced in partnership with the Forum of Private Business,
<span><span><a href="http://bit.ly/JpUAss">click
here</a></span></span></p>

<p><span></span></p>
]]></description></item><item><title>No Respite in 2012</title><link>http://www.graydoninternational.com/blog/2012/4/20/no-respite-in-2012.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.graydoninternational.com/blog/2012/4/20/no-respite-in-2012.aspx</guid><description><![CDATA[ 
<p>As we enter the second quarter of 2012, many wonder whether
there is any room for optimism for the rest of the year. I see no
evidence of this as yet and Graydon's first quarter Insolvency
Predictor statistics confirm a difficult start for those businesses
supplying to the construction sector.</p>

<p>The main area of concern for the sector include the challenges
linked to the availability of affordable finance and the continuing
pressure being brought by HMRC following the cessation of the "TTP"
( time to pay ) scheme. This arises from the fact that over 95% of
winding up petitions are presented by HMRC. Tax collection is a
high priority. The Government needs all the money it can lay its
hands on. Major projects are scarce, even more so since the
completion of projects relating to the London 2012 Olympics and it
is doubtful that the Government will change its cost cutting stance
on future building projects, certainly not in 2012 and probably not
for the first half of 2013.</p>

<p>The Office of National Statistics has found that the level of
insolvencies for the fourth quarter of 2011 and first quarter of
2012 were lower than in the corresponding period for 2010/11.
Whilst that may be true, results show that this broad view does not
necessarily apply to the construction sector.</p>

<p>An area which does provide a cause for concern is the lack of
affordable finance available. Major lenders are not overly
supporting businesses and SMEs are still struggling despite the
range of government schemes and incentives available. The banks are
simply not playing ball and this has led to alternative lenders
entering and consolidating their position in the market place with
higher interest rates and ultimately higher costs. This increasing
trend is often referred to as suicidal selling. Companies are being
pressured to sell at any cost by their existing lenders in order to
generate revenue. However, this can lead to businesses finding
themselves at breaking point as their cash flows begin to take a
hit.</p>

<p>Credit insurers remain very wary of any business operating in
and supplying to the construction sector and cover is hard to come
by in many cases, if at all. However, it is difficult to lay blame
with credit insurers as in the past two years a large percentage of
claims and pay outs came from the construction and non-food
retailing sectors.</p>

<p>Self-insurance, to a certain degree is a fact of life in 2012 as
it was in 2011 with or without credit Insurance. Sales are
important as they are the life blood of any company. However, now
more than ever, credit managers are challenged with tackling
changing payment terms and bad debts.</p>

<p>Buyers are very conscious about keeping existing suppliers
happy. They are therefore more forthcoming in supplying additional
information, be it management or draft accounts or supplying
details of the coming year's prospects, new work in the pipe-line
and who they are selling to or working for.</p>

<p>Some helpful tips: ask questions, it will help you build up a
better picture of who you are dealing with and what state their
business is in. Work with your sales team, not against them. You,
as a business will benefit from this in the long run as the sales
team will pick up on information on how your customer is
performing.</p>

<p>Finally, question your credit information supplier as well as
your credit insurer. Remember that you both need each other.</p>

<p>Despite this sounding gloomy, I am confident that better times
are ahead.</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p>Colin Sanders</p>

<p>Head of Intelligence, Timber</p>

<p>Graydon UK Ltd</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p>If you would like to know more about Graydon UK Ltd and in
particular it's Timber Intelligence Network, call Colin Sanders or
Melanie Morgan on 020 8515 1405 / 1488.</p>
]]></description></item><item><title>The haves and the have-nots?</title><link>http://www.graydoninternational.com/blog/2012/4/19/the-haves-and-the-have-nots.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.graydoninternational.com/blog/2012/4/19/the-haves-and-the-have-nots.aspx</guid><description><![CDATA[ 
<p>Large non-financial companies are stashing £754bn of cash, equal
to 50% of GDP. Meanwhile, one in five SMEs cite access to finance
as a major barrier to growth, with 41 per cent of loan applicants
being refused. Prosperity and austerity may seem unlikely
bed-fellows but they really do have something in common. They are
all British, and for very different reasons they are strangling
recovery.</p>

<p>With the government expecting the private sector to drive the
economic recovery, why is their plan failing? Big business is
neither spending nor investing; instead it accumulates vast cash
piles and waits for market conditions to improve. SMEs see their
expansion plans thwarted by increased overheads, weak customer
demand and the high cost and availability of finance. A tale of the
haves and the have-nots.</p>

<p>Small wonder then that Ernst &amp; Young's ITEM Club -
representing our 'prosperity party' - "expect growth this year of
0.4%, half the government's own Office for Budget Responsibility
forecast." The Federation of Small Businesses' Voice of Small
Business Index - representing our 'austerity party' -&nbsp; "finds
weak consumer demand, utility costs and access to finance the most
likely barriers to achieving the largely sanguine growth
aspirations of its members."</p>

<p>So, with the prosperous taking money out of the economy and the
austere having little to give to it, risk averse businesses stunt
growth. Order books aren't expanding and jobs aren't increasing.
For big business it's surely the time to loosen the corporate belt,
and for SMEs it's surely time for the banks and alternative lenders
to loosen their fiscal belt?</p>

<p>Companies must also be instilled with the confidence to extend
trade credit to one another. The ability to showcase their
financial strengths and potential for sustainable growth are vital
in achieving this. Ensuring they have reliable, correct and
predictable customer creditworthiness data to enable them to assess
risk and do business assuredly is paramount.<br />
<br />
 This is why we continue to urge government to protect and support
the integrity of data held on businesses at Companies House. What a
business has done in the recent past is a clear guide to what it
will do in the near future, making its filed accounts essential for
the credit reference industry to help companies transact with
confidence and optimise their credit decision-making capacity.
We're absolutely behind the headline scheme but this can't come at
the cost of forgetting other forces which help finance flow through
the economy.<br />
</p>
]]></description></item><item><title>Trade Credit Insurance Premiums to Rise</title><link>http://www.graydoninternational.com/blog/2012/3/29/trade-credit-insurance-premiums-to-rise.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.graydoninternational.com/blog/2012/3/29/trade-credit-insurance-premiums-to-rise.aspx</guid><description><![CDATA[ 
<p>Last week we brought you the news about the decrease in the
number of UK company failures in the first quarter of 2012 and it
is probably a good time to elaborate on this, especially now that
credit insurers are asking for more disclosure from debtors. Euler
Hermes, one of the worlds 3 largest trade credit insurers, along
with Atradius and Coface, says the provision of confidential
financial information "enables us to base our underwriting
decisions on the most up to date position". As it happens, all 3 of
whom are Graydon UK's major shareholders.</p>

<p>In its UK risk bulletin for 2012, Euler Hermes said it had begun
the year with a sense of nervousness, as it expected levels of
insolvencies to remain at an extremely high level. It added: "It is
clear that it is not just smaller entities failing. Insolvencies
are not increasing in volume, but are definitely increasing in
size".</p>

<p>Euler Hermes provided a further insight into the thinking of the
sector in a recent report on the global economic outlook. It
highlighted the food, pharmaceuticals, automobile manufacturers and
chemicals sector as "holding firm", but raised concerns about
retail, air transport and construction companies in Europe.</p>

<p>"When the crisis hit in 2008-2009, trade credit insurers had a
lot of companies for which they couldn't get quick information and
they had to act very quickly, in the face of greater than expected
losses. There was too much insufficient data. They've certainly
learnt their lesson and have since built their databases up
significantly. Their risk assessment is much better."</p>

<p>As a result of these requirements and the increased risk of
greater insolvencies, brokers are saying that overall, the cost of
such insurance is expected to rise this year. Richard Talboys,
trade credit leader at Willis, says: "When you look at the Euro
crisis, the Greek issue, and the downturn in public spending - you
do question many product lines and the fear is from the insurers
that their will be a few big ones (failures) on the horizon.</p>

<p>From SMEs to larger firms, some would argue, we may see a slight
upward trend in the demand for credit reporting and monitoring.
This will however, depend on the perceived value that firms place
on their risk. &nbsp;Whether you insure your credit risk or not, it
is always prudent to rely on credit ratings and reports that are
approved by major credit insurance companies in order to base your
decisions on &nbsp;the best information available.</p>

<p>(je)</p>
]]></description></item><item><title>Budget 2012: How will it help businesses?</title><link>http://www.graydoninternational.com/blog/2012/3/22/budget-2012-how-will-it-help-businesses.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.graydoninternational.com/blog/2012/3/22/budget-2012-how-will-it-help-businesses.aspx</guid><description><![CDATA[ 
<p>George Osborne is coming under real pressure to deliver
affordable finance to businesses. The National Loan Guarantee
Scheme is admirable in its thinking but it won't be successful
unless the Government communicate effectively with banks and
businesses so that all parties understand how it works and how to
take advantage of it.</p>

<p>But these credit easing measures alone will not be enough to
deliver the sustainable growth that UK companies are crying out
for. Companies also need to be instilled with the confidence to
extend trade credit to one another. The ability to showcase their
financial strengths and potential for sustainable growth is key to
achieving this. Ensuring they have reliable, accurate and
predictable customer creditworthiness data to enable them to assess
risk and do business assuredly is also crucial here.</p>

<p>This is why we're urging the Chancellor to do everything he can
to protect and maintain the integrity of data held on businesses at
Companies House, which is an essential part of enabling the credit
reference industry to help companies feel assured they can transact
with confidence and optimise their credit decision making capacity.
We're absolutely behind the headline scheme but this can't come at
the cost of forgetting other forces which can help finance flow
through the economy.</p>

<p>View video <a
href="http://bit.ly/GNqvAS">http://bit.ly/GNqvAS</a></p>

<p>Hosted by Economia editor Richard Cree, the panel considered
what the likely impact of the government announcements will be on
business and stimulating UK growth. Danielle Stewart, of Baker
Tilly, Gordon Skaljak of Graydon UK and Sarah Buckley of ICAEW
analyse what the 2012 Budget means for UK business and medium sized
firms. <a href="http://bit.ly/GGdYjr">http://bit.ly/GGdYjr</a></p>

<p>This webinar was screened live at 4pm on 21.03.12.</p>
]]></description></item><item><title>Decrease in the number of UK company failures in the first quarter of 2012</title><link>http://www.graydoninternational.com/blog/2012/3/19/decrease-in-the-number-of-uk-company-failures-in-the-first-quarter-of-2012.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.graydoninternational.com/blog/2012/3/19/decrease-in-the-number-of-uk-company-failures-in-the-first-quarter-of-2012.aspx</guid><description><![CDATA[ 
<p>Company failure rates during the first three months of 2012 were
nearly 20 percent (19.9 per cent) lower than the same time period
two years ago (2010) according to the latest <span>Graydon UK
Insolvency Predictor</span>.</p>

<p>Based on data published today by the commercial credit
referencing agency <a
href="/UKContent/UKPublicHTMLPages/index.html">Graydon UK</a>, the
number of corporate insolvencies during the first quarter of 2012
were also 22.8 per cent down on the same period three years ago
(2009).</p>

<p>The numbers of insolvencies in the first quarter of this year
(2012) were 3.7 per cent lower than the same period last year
(2011). Furthermore, company failures in the first quarter this
year are down by nearly 5 per cent (4.4 per cent) compared with the
last three months of December 2011. This suggests that company
liquidations will continue to decrease this quarter.</p>

<p>The good news is we are seeing a decrease in the number of
business failures. However, although the threat of a double dip
recession may appear to be receding, it is still important for
businesses to identify both opportunities and risks if they want to
increase their businesses efficiency and bottom line growth.</p>

<p>This quarter's <span>Graydon UK Insolvency Predictor</span> has
found that the number of insolvencies in the manufacturing sector
has decreased slightly following the peak at the end of last year.
According to a recent UK Trade and Investment report, the UK is one
of the top manufacturers in the world and Government initiatives
such as 'Made in Britain' and 'Going for Growth' are targeted at
helping production businesses in order to rebalance the
economy.</p>

<p>Whilst support for small and medium sized manufacturing firms
exists, in the current economic climate, access to finance is still
a challenge for all businesses. Many firms find it difficult to
keep their heads above water, putting their suppliers on shaky
ground.</p>

<p>However, there are a number of ways businesses can protect
themselves from insolvency. Firstly, businesses must ensure that
they prevent themselves from the damage caused by late and
non-payments. Running regular credit checks is vital for businesses
and it will mean that businesses will be alert to any changes in
their customers' circumstances that could lead to non-payment in
the future.</p>

<p>It's also important that businesses build up a strong credit
rating in order to be able to secure alternative sources of funding
quickly should their cash flow take a hit. This takes time and
businesses must act now to do this.</p>
]]></description></item><item><title>Definition of an SME: Small, Medium and Excluded?</title><link>http://www.graydoninternational.com/blog/2012/3/16/definition-of-an-sme-small,-medium-and-excluded.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.graydoninternational.com/blog/2012/3/16/definition-of-an-sme-small,-medium-and-excluded.aspx</guid><description><![CDATA[ 
<p>Big business accounts for 9.2m jobs. SMEs account for 13.6m jobs
or 6 out of 10 private sector jobs. Since 2001 big business
employment has fallen by 1m. Exactly the opposite has happened to
SMEs, where they've added 1m jobs.</p>

<p>Compare these statistics to the government's Project Merlin that
set our five largest banks the task of lending money to businesses
big and small. £190bn was the target of which £76bn would go to
SMEs. The overall target was beaten by almost £25bn, but none of
that excess went to SMEs. In fact, SMEs received £74.9bn, £1.1bn
less than their target. As usual, access to finance favoured big
business with the real job creators - the SMEs - getting the
short-straw.</p>

<p>Business secretary Vince Cable believes the economic recovery is
'being imperilled' by a 'yawning mismatch' between demands for
finance from small business and bank lending. And so say all of us!
But hang on Mr Cable; surely you're in government and in a position
to do something about it? Evidently not.</p>

<p>The Federation of Small Business (FSB) says that access to
finance is a 'major barrier' to growth for than one in five small
companies. Indeed, 41% of loan applicants were declined in the
three months to February. Head of policy at the FSB, Graeme Fisher,
says that 'our existing banking system is not geared up for
lower-end loans of less than £25,000, there's no money in it.'</p>

<p>Now George Osborne is promising that his Credit Easing programme
- announced in November - will go live before next week's budget.
£20bn is available and all of it for SMEs. Hallelujah. After the
failure of Project Merlin, Graeme Fisher is reserving judgement
saying that 'implementation is all.' Let's hope they get it right
because the theory is excellent - banks get hit if the business
goes bust or fails to repay the loan but the government guarantee
means banks will obtain the money at a very low interest rate, one
they'll be expected to pass on to SMEs.</p>

<p>I hope the budget will include even more good news for SMEs;
relaxed employment law, simplified tax reporting and reduced
corporation tax to 15%. But a lighter touch on regulations can also
backfire. So please Mr Cable, let's see an end to your plan to
<span>remove the need for independently audited accounts for tens
of thousands of small businesses. You may reduce their workload but
you'll also cut-off or limit their access to credit. You know it
makes sense.</span></p>

<p>(ct)</p>
]]></description></item><item><title>Sharing is caring</title><link>http://www.graydoninternational.com/blog/2012/3/14/sharing-is-caring.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.graydoninternational.com/blog/2012/3/14/sharing-is-caring.aspx</guid><description><![CDATA[ 
<p>With <a
href="http://www.graydon-reducingtherisk.com/gfx/email/Survey2012_01/SurveyResultsLandingPage.html">
recent survey results from Graydon UK</a> showing that the number
of credit professionals staying in their jobs is growing, it is no
surprise that that the number of older professionals in the credit
industry is steadily increasing. This is partly due to the strain
of the financial crisis which is forcing people to work for longer
to help build up their pension pots. Recent findings from the ONS
also found that the average retirement age has risen by almost 12
months over the past 6 years. It seems that credit professionals
are not alone in staying in their jobs for longer.</p>

<p>In an environment where organisations only hire a small team of
credit professionals, it is sometimes difficult to keep younger
staff motivated. This important, albeit not unique challenge is
particularly relevant to those leading credit functions.</p>

<p>Whilst speaking to a friend who works in the HR function of a
growing business the other day, he mentioned the Employee Value
Proposition (EVP) as a possible solution. Too often, organisations
make the error of viewing their EVP as a strategy for building up
their pipeline for external talent. The key to success, however, is
to build a strategy that retains and develops existing talent and
does not just focus on attracting new talent. This is also a more
cost effective solution.</p>

<p>The EVP solution includes investing in training and development
activities for staff. This will ensure that both senior and junior
management feel like they are constantly updating their skills set.
Peers can then share their knowledge and skills amongst each other.
This will not only boost the performance of staff but also
encourage them to work as a team which will not only improve the
value of the credit function but the reputation of the department
within the business as a whole.</p>

<p>Senior management should also help mentor new hires. This will
keep them inspired about career progression and prevent a skills
gap from developing. As the issue of talent management becomes
increasingly important in the corporate agenda, it is important
that all members of the team feel encouraged and inspired in their
roles. If they think career progression is suspect, they are more
likely to become demotivated and frustrated.</p>

<p>Investing in training and development skills for employees will
allow businesses to attract and retain the best talent out there.
Having the best people in the right positions will propel the
organisation as a whole. People want to work for a company in which
they can excel and progress.&nbsp; Keeping people accredited will
not only benefit your employees, but also improve the reputation of
your business and ultimately, keep customers happy.</p>

<p>Businesses often have the misconception that training courses
will be expensive and time consuming. However, development can
often be achieved through a series of shorter one-day courses such
as the ones Graydon runs <a
href="http://bit.ly/zFuj48">http://bit.ly/zFuj48</a></p>

<p>A successfully performing credit function is crucial to a
business. Strong in-house teams will then be able to maximise the
benefit of partnering with a credit reference agency when
interpreting data, identifying risks to credit and cash flow and to
help find opportunities for growth.&nbsp; Credit functions act to
maximise business efficiency and will help improve prospects for
growth.</p>

<p>(ws)</p>
]]></description></item><item><title>Issues accessing finance? Look to the crowd (and China!)</title><link>http://www.graydoninternational.com/blog/2012/3/12/issues-accessing-finance-look-to-the-crowd-(and-china!).aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.graydoninternational.com/blog/2012/3/12/issues-accessing-finance-look-to-the-crowd-(and-china!).aspx</guid><description><![CDATA[ 
<p>Leafing through Friday's edition of <em>The Times</em> I got
another harsh reminder of the austerity era when reading a piece
from the paper's retail correspondent, Marcus Leroux, reporting
upon the rising trend among SME owners to approach pawnbrokers as
part of their efforts to secure business finance. When businesses
have to resort to such desperate measures, you have to ask, are we
really "<em>all in it together</em>" ?</p>

<p>That punchy sound bite seems to be debated in the media and in
the Commons on an almost daily basis, but what does it actually
mean? If it means mud-slinging at bankers, people on benefits and
generally anyone who's not 'us' then we're doing a very good job of
it, but&nbsp; I think it means something different.</p>

<p>Being 'in it together' means sticking together. It shouldn't
mean company owners having to resort to pawning their assets. And
if you want to know how we can stick together better, then Chinese
business culture can teach us a lesson or two. Particularly the
Chinese immigrant community in Spain. Not only are Chinese in Spain
gainfully employed, but they are also becoming very successful.</p>

<p>Despite making up fewer than 3% of the immigrant population the
Chinese account for 24% of foreign born entrepreneurs. And sticking
together is the secret of their success. The cohesive communities
support new arrivals by finding them work. &nbsp;They also provide
each other with further support by pooling their resources and
creating informal lending groups.</p>

<p>With an easy way to borrow money, small businesses can be
established and they can also expand and grow, creating more job
opportunities as they do so. The trust within the community is
admirable, but what's more important is that it's working.<br />
<br />
 We might just be able to learn from these small immigrant
communities that can find success with informal lending and an
altruistic approach.&nbsp; UK company owners might not be able to
call for support of a community network based on nationality but
it's exciting to see the emergence of crowd sourcing as a route to
funding new ventures as well as growing existing ones.</p>

<p>Despite the novelty of such an approach, the fundamentals of
ensuring a business remains an attractive proposition for credit
extension remain the same. Aspiring entrepreneurs need still to
present the financial case for their venture in the best possible
light, ensuring their accounting is transparent and timely, so that
credit reference agencies can rely upon the most accurate possible
data when making rating recommendations.</p>

<p>And therein lies yet another reason why attempts to legislate
away the quality of data maintained at Companies House must be
resisted at all costs. We're in this together after all.</p>

<p>(sjp/ws)</p>
]]></description></item></channel></rss>

