IN JULY last year, the coalition government made it clear that
to save frontline public services it would look to save billions
through a more professional approach to procurement.
Well, things have certainly been hotting up nicely since then.
Firstly, in August, Cabinet Office minister Francis Maude
(pictured) appointed John Collington, the Home Office's Group
commercial director, to head up procurement in the newly-formed
Efficiency and Reform Group.
Then, in October, Sir Philip Green, Top Shop owner, criticised
government departments for poor procurement management and wasting
taxpayers money. Next, we saw the Cabinet Office arrange a summit
with 31 of the government's leading suppliers with the intention of
delivering the message that the "government will no longer offer
the easy profit margins of the past".
Memorandi of Understanding have been signed with many large
suppliers to save money and to buy from them as a single customer.
Just before Christmas, it was announced that Xerox and Vertex had
just signed up to cost-saving agreements.
Pressure continues to mount on the government to put its
procurement house in order, but also on its suppliers, who, let's
face it, must have benefitted substantially from amateurish
purchasing by public bodies over a long period of time.
Only this week in the Times, another insider revealed that the NHS
was probably wasting a billion a year on procurement, apparently,
it was discovered that eight Trusts were buying the same pacemaker
for 19 different prices- some wasting up to £750 on each one.
While this all spells good news for taxpayers, I just wonder how
much pressure will be exerted by large powerful suppliers on their
own suppliers down the line if profit margins get squeezed by more
professional Government procurement measures?
Serco was one of the companies involved in the recent summit
meetings with the Cabinet Office to reduce costs, and look what
they tried to do in response to the threat- sent letters to
suppliers asking them to accept a retrospective annual rebate on
spend.
However, no taxpayer should criticise the government for doing
what it is doing- trying to cut waste has to be applauded,
especially if the result is less cuts to frontline services.